Relatives' Distress Over Shoreline Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.
An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards
Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.
A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Seeking Answers and Clarity
An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.
Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”
It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”
The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.